1958 Cadillac 62 vs. 2002 Volkswagen Bora
To start off, 2002 Volkswagen Bora is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,979 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Cadillac 62 (189 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 81 more horse power than 2002 Volkswagen Bora. (108 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1958 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2002 Volkswagen Bora. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1000 kg more than 2002 Volkswagen Bora. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Cadillac 62 | 2002 Volkswagen Bora | |
| Make | Cadillac | Volkswagen |
| Model | 62 | Bora |
| Year Released | 1958 | 2002 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5979 cc | 1594 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 189 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 2195 kg | 1195 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5640 mm | 4380 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2520 mm |
