1958 Cadillac 62 vs. 2003 Chevrolet Silverado
To start off, 2003 Chevrolet Silverado is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 6,000 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Chevrolet Silverado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Chevrolet Silverado (340 HP @ 4400 RPM) has 150 more horse power than 1958 Cadillac 62. (190 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Chevrolet Silverado should accelerate faster than 1958 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Chevrolet Silverado weights approximately 315 kg more than 1958 Cadillac 62. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2003 Chevrolet Silverado is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1958 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Chevrolet Silverado will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Cadillac 62 | 2003 Chevrolet Silverado | |
Make | Cadillac | Chevrolet |
Model | 62 | Silverado |
Year Released | 1958 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5980 cc | 6000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 340 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 2085 kg | 2400 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5520 mm | 5790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 3650 mm |