1958 Cadillac 62 vs. 2003 Dodge Viper
To start off, 2003 Dodge Viper is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 8,277 cc (10 cylinders), 2003 Dodge Viper is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Dodge Viper (500 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 310 more horse power than 1958 Cadillac 62. (190 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Dodge Viper should accelerate faster than 1958 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 550 kg more than 2003 Dodge Viper.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Cadillac 62 | 2003 Dodge Viper | |
Make | Cadillac | Dodge |
Model | 62 | Viper |
Year Released | 1958 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5980 cc | 8277 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 10 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 500 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2085 kg | 1535 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5520 mm | 4470 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1950 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1220 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2520 mm |