1958 Cadillac 62 vs. 2003 Fiat Panda
To start off, 2003 Fiat Panda is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,980 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Cadillac 62 (189 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 132 more horse power than 2003 Fiat Panda. (57 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1958 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2003 Fiat Panda. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1235 kg more than 2003 Fiat Panda. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Cadillac 62 | 2003 Fiat Panda | |
Make | Cadillac | Fiat |
Model | 62 | Panda |
Year Released | 1958 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5980 cc | 1249 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 189 HP | 57 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 2095 kg | 860 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5640 mm | 3540 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2350 mm |