1958 Cadillac 62 vs. 2003 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2003 Toyota 4Runner is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,980 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Toyota 4Runner (242 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 1958 Cadillac 62. (189 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Toyota 4Runner should accelerate faster than 1958 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 195 kg more than 2003 Toyota 4Runner.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Cadillac 62 | 2003 Toyota 4Runner | |
| Make | Cadillac | Toyota |
| Model | 62 | 4Runner |
| Year Released | 1958 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5980 cc | 3995 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 189 HP | 242 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 2095 kg | 1900 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5640 mm | 4810 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2800 mm |
