1958 Cadillac 62 vs. 2003 Toyota Solara
To start off, 2003 Toyota Solara is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,979 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Cadillac 62 (189 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 27 more horse power than 2003 Toyota Solara. (162 HP @ 5300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1958 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2003 Toyota Solara. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 800 kg more than 2003 Toyota Solara. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Cadillac 62 | 2003 Toyota Solara | |
| Make | Cadillac | Toyota |
| Model | 62 | Solara |
| Year Released | 1958 | 2003 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5979 cc | 2437 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 189 HP | 162 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5300 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 2195 kg | 1395 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5640 mm | 4830 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2680 mm |
