1958 Cadillac 62 vs. 2003 Volvo V70
To start off, 2003 Volvo V70 is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,979 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Volvo V70 (207 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 1958 Cadillac 62. (189 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Volvo V70 should accelerate faster than 1958 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 533 kg more than 2003 Volvo V70.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Cadillac 62 | 2003 Volvo V70 | |
Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
Model | 62 | V70 |
Year Released | 1958 | 2003 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5979 cc | 2521 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 189 HP | 207 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 2195 kg | 1662 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5640 mm | 4740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2770 mm |