1958 Cadillac 62 vs. 2004 Ford Mustang
To start off, 2004 Ford Mustang is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,980 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Mustang (260 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 71 more horse power than 1958 Cadillac 62. (189 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1958 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 577 kg more than 2004 Ford Mustang.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Cadillac 62 | 2004 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | 62 | Mustang |
Year Released | 1958 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5980 cc | 4605 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 189 HP | 260 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Vehicle Weight | 2095 kg | 1518 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5640 mm | 4660 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2630 mm |