1958 Cadillac 62 vs. 2004 Mazda 2
To start off, 2004 Mazda 2 is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,979 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Cadillac 62 (189 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 115 more horse power than 2004 Mazda 2. (74 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1958 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2004 Mazda 2. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1145 kg more than 2004 Mazda 2. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Cadillac 62 | 2004 Mazda 2 | |
Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
Model | 62 | 2 |
Year Released | 1958 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5979 cc | 1242 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 189 HP | 74 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 2195 kg | 1050 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5640 mm | 3930 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2500 mm |