1958 Cadillac 62 vs. 2004 Mazda Tribute
To start off, 2004 Mazda Tribute is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,980 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda Tribute (201 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1958 Cadillac 62. (190 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda Tribute should accelerate faster than 1958 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 502 kg more than 2004 Mazda Tribute.
Because 2004 Mazda Tribute is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1958 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Mazda Tribute will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Cadillac 62 | 2004 Mazda Tribute | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mazda |
| Model | 62 | Tribute |
| Year Released | 1958 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5980 cc | 2966 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 190 HP | 201 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 2085 kg | 1583 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5520 mm | 4400 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1780 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2620 mm |
