1958 Cadillac 62 vs. 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK
To start off, 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,979 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK (362 HP @ 4200 RPM) has 173 more horse power than 1958 Cadillac 62. (189 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK should accelerate faster than 1958 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 546 kg more than 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Cadillac 62 | 2004 Mercedes-Benz CLK | |
Make | Cadillac | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | 62 | CLK |
Year Released | 1958 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5979 cc | 5441 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 189 HP | 362 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Vehicle Weight | 2195 kg | 1649 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5640 mm | 4640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2700 mm |