1958 Cadillac 62 vs. 2004 Mercedes-Benz ML
To start off, 2004 Mercedes-Benz ML is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,979 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Cadillac 62 (189 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 2004 Mercedes-Benz ML. (187 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1958 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2004 Mercedes-Benz ML. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 85 kg more than 2004 Mercedes-Benz ML. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Cadillac 62 | 2004 Mercedes-Benz ML | |
Make | Cadillac | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | 62 | ML |
Year Released | 1958 | 2004 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5979 cc | 2986 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 189 HP | 187 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4200 RPM |
Vehicle Weight | 2195 kg | 2110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5640 mm | 4790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2970 mm |