1958 Cadillac 62 vs. 2004 Nissan X-Trail
To start off, 2004 Nissan X-Trail is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,980 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Cadillac 62 (189 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 77 more horse power than 2004 Nissan X-Trail. (112 HP @ 2000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1958 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2004 Nissan X-Trail. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 495 kg more than 2004 Nissan X-Trail. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Cadillac 62 | 2004 Nissan X-Trail | |
| Make | Cadillac | Nissan |
| Model | 62 | X-Trail |
| Year Released | 1958 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5980 cc | 2184 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 189 HP | 112 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 2000 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 2095 kg | 1600 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2540 mm |
