1958 Cadillac 62 vs. 2004 Seat Arosa
To start off, 2004 Seat Arosa is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,980 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Cadillac 62 (189 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 140 more horse power than 2004 Seat Arosa. (49 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1958 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2004 Seat Arosa. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1140 kg more than 2004 Seat Arosa. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Cadillac 62 | 2004 Seat Arosa | |
| Make | Cadillac | Seat |
| Model | 62 | Arosa |
| Year Released | 1958 | 2004 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5980 cc | 999 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 189 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
| Vehicle Weight | 2095 kg | 955 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5640 mm | 3560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2330 mm |
