1958 Cadillac 62 vs. 2005 Chevrolet Malibu
To start off, 2005 Chevrolet Malibu is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,980 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Chevrolet Malibu (201 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 11 more horse power than 1958 Cadillac 62. (190 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 1958 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 626 kg more than 2005 Chevrolet Malibu.
Because 1958 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Chevrolet Malibu, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Cadillac 62 | 2005 Chevrolet Malibu | |
Make | Cadillac | Chevrolet |
Model | 62 | Malibu |
Year Released | 1958 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5980 cc | 3491 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 201 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 2085 kg | 1459 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5520 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1780 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2710 mm |