1958 Cadillac 62 vs. 2005 Land Rover LR3
To start off, 2005 Land Rover LR3 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,980 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Land Rover LR3 (301 HP) has 111 more horse power than 1958 Cadillac 62. (190 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Land Rover LR3 should accelerate faster than 1958 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Land Rover LR3 weights approximately 376 kg more than 1958 Cadillac 62. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2005 Land Rover LR3 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1958 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2005 Land Rover LR3 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Cadillac 62 | 2005 Land Rover LR3 | |
Make | Cadillac | Land Rover |
Model | 62 | LR3 |
Year Released | 1958 | 2005 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5980 cc | 4392 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 301 HP |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 2085 kg | 2461 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5520 mm | 4860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1920 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1890 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2890 mm |