1958 Cadillac 62 vs. 2005 Land Rover LR3
To start off, 2005 Land Rover LR3 is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,979 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Land Rover LR3 (301 HP) has 112 more horse power than 1958 Cadillac 62. (189 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Land Rover LR3 should accelerate faster than 1958 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Land Rover LR3 weights approximately 266 kg more than 1958 Cadillac 62. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Cadillac 62 | 2005 Land Rover LR3 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Land Rover |
| Model | 62 | LR3 |
| Year Released | 1958 | 2005 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5979 cc | 4392 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 189 HP | 301 HP |
| Vehicle Weight | 2195 kg | 2461 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5640 mm | 4860 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2890 mm |
