1958 Cadillac 62 vs. 2006 Land Rover Defender
To start off, 2006 Land Rover Defender is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,980 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 3 kg more than 2006 Land Rover Defender.
Because 2006 Land Rover Defender is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1958 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Land Rover Defender will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Cadillac 62 | 2006 Land Rover Defender | |
Make | Cadillac | Land Rover |
Model | 62 | Defender |
Year Released | 1958 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5980 cc | 2495 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 2085 kg | 2082 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5520 mm | 4390 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1950 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2800 mm |