1958 Cadillac 62 vs. 2006 Mercedes-Benz ML
To start off, 2006 Mercedes-Benz ML is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,980 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mercedes-Benz ML (288 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 98 more horse power than 1958 Cadillac 62. (190 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mercedes-Benz ML should accelerate faster than 1958 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2006 Mercedes-Benz ML weights approximately 125 kg more than 1958 Cadillac 62. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Mercedes-Benz ML is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1958 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Mercedes-Benz ML will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Cadillac 62 | 2006 Mercedes-Benz ML | |
Make | Cadillac | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | 62 | ML |
Year Released | 1958 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5980 cc | 4965 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 288 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 2085 kg | 2210 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5520 mm | 4640 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2830 mm |