1958 Cadillac 62 vs. 2006 Volkswagen Polo
To start off, 2006 Volkswagen Polo is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,979 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Cadillac 62 (189 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 135 more horse power than 2006 Volkswagen Polo. (54 HP @ 4750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1958 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2006 Volkswagen Polo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1123 kg more than 2006 Volkswagen Polo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Cadillac 62 | 2006 Volkswagen Polo | |
Make | Cadillac | Volkswagen |
Model | 62 | Polo |
Year Released | 1958 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5979 cc | 1198 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 189 HP | 54 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Vehicle Weight | 2195 kg | 1072 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5640 mm | 3920 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2470 mm |