1958 Cadillac 62 vs. 2006 Volvo V70
To start off, 2006 Volvo V70 is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,980 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Cadillac 62 (190 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 29 more horse power than 2006 Volvo V70. (161 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1958 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2006 Volvo V70. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 438 kg more than 2006 Volvo V70. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Volvo V70 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1958 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Volvo V70 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Cadillac 62 | 2006 Volvo V70 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
| Model | 62 | V70 |
| Year Released | 1958 | 2006 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5980 cc | 2401 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 190 HP | 161 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
| Vehicle Weight | 2085 kg | 1647 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5520 mm | 4720 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1810 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1490 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2760 mm |
