1958 Cadillac 62 vs. 2007 Mercedes-Benz SL
To start off, 2007 Mercedes-Benz SL is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Cadillac 62 would be higher. Both 1958 Cadillac 62 and 2007 Mercedes-Benz SL are equipped with a 5,980 cc engine. In terms of performance, 2007 Mercedes-Benz SL (616 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 426 more horse power than 1958 Cadillac 62. (190 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2007 Mercedes-Benz SL should accelerate faster than 1958 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 135 kg more than 2007 Mercedes-Benz SL.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Cadillac 62 | 2007 Mercedes-Benz SL | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | 62 | SL |
| Year Released | 1958 | 2007 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5980 cc | 5980 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
| Horse Power | 190 HP | 616 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4800 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 2085 kg | 1950 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5520 mm | 4540 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1300 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1830 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2570 mm |
