1958 Cadillac 62 vs. 2009 Chrysler Aspen
To start off, 2009 Chrysler Aspen is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,980 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chrysler Aspen (340 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 150 more horse power than 1958 Cadillac 62. (190 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chrysler Aspen should accelerate faster than 1958 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 207 kg more than 2009 Chrysler Aspen.
Because 2009 Chrysler Aspen is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1958 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chrysler Aspen will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Cadillac 62 | 2009 Chrysler Aspen | |
Make | Cadillac | Chrysler |
Model | 62 | Aspen |
Year Released | 1958 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5980 cc | 5654 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 340 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 2085 kg | 1878 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5520 mm | 5140 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1940 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1880 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 3030 mm |