1958 Cadillac 62 vs. 2009 Chrysler Crossfire
To start off, 2009 Chrysler Crossfire is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,980 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chrysler Crossfire (215 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 1958 Cadillac 62. (190 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chrysler Crossfire should accelerate faster than 1958 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 50 kg more than 2009 Chrysler Crossfire.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Cadillac 62 | 2009 Chrysler Crossfire | |
| Make | Cadillac | Chrysler |
| Model | 62 | Crossfire |
| Year Released | 1958 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5980 cc | 3199 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 3 valves |
| Horse Power | 190 HP | 215 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5700 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 2085 kg | 2035 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5520 mm | 4060 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1770 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1320 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2410 mm |
