1958 Cadillac 62 vs. 2009 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2009 Ford Falcon is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,980 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Ford Falcon (261 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 72 more horse power than 1958 Cadillac 62. (189 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Ford Falcon should accelerate faster than 1958 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 391 kg more than 2009 Ford Falcon.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Cadillac 62 | 2009 Ford Falcon | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | 62 | Falcon |
| Year Released | 1958 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5980 cc | 3983 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 189 HP | 261 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 2095 kg | 1704 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5640 mm | 4967 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2838 mm |
