1958 Cadillac 62 vs. 2009 Jeep Compass
To start off, 2009 Jeep Compass is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,979 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Cadillac 62 (189 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 2009 Jeep Compass. (172 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1958 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2009 Jeep Compass. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 152 kg more than 2009 Jeep Compass. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Cadillac 62 | 2009 Jeep Compass | |
| Make | Cadillac | Jeep |
| Model | 62 | Compass |
| Year Released | 1958 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5979 cc | 2360 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 189 HP | 172 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 2195 kg | 2043 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5640 mm | 4410 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2640 mm |
