1958 Cadillac 62 vs. 2009 Land Rover Freelander
To start off, 2009 Land Rover Freelander is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,980 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Cadillac 62 (190 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 32 more horse power than 2009 Land Rover Freelander. (158 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1958 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2009 Land Rover Freelander. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Land Rover Freelander weights approximately 623 kg more than 1958 Cadillac 62.
Because 2009 Land Rover Freelander is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1958 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Land Rover Freelander will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Cadillac 62 | 2009 Land Rover Freelander | |
Make | Cadillac | Land Rover |
Model | 62 | Freelander |
Year Released | 1958 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5980 cc | 2179 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 158 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 2085 kg | 2708 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5520 mm | 4510 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1750 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1930 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2670 mm |