1958 Cadillac 62 vs. 2009 Land Rover LR2
To start off, 2009 Land Rover LR2 is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,980 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Land Rover LR2 (231 HP @ 6300 RPM) has 41 more horse power than 1958 Cadillac 62. (190 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Land Rover LR2 should accelerate faster than 1958 Cadillac 62.
Because 2009 Land Rover LR2 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1958 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Land Rover LR2 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Cadillac 62 | 2009 Land Rover LR2 | |
Make | Cadillac | Land Rover |
Model | 62 | LR2 |
Year Released | 1958 | 2009 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5980 cc | 3192 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 231 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6300 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Length | 5520 mm | 4500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1750 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2670 mm |