1958 Cadillac 62 vs. 2009 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2009 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 51 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,980 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Land Rover Range Rover (301 HP @ 5750 RPM) has 112 more horse power than 1958 Cadillac 62. (189 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2009 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1958 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 391 kg more than 1958 Cadillac 62. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Cadillac 62 | 2009 Land Rover Range Rover | |
| Make | Cadillac | Land Rover |
| Model | 62 | Range Rover |
| Year Released | 1958 | 2009 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5980 cc | 4394 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 189 HP | 301 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5750 RPM |
| Vehicle Weight | 2095 kg | 2486 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5640 mm | 4510 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 3230 mm |
