1958 Cadillac 62 vs. 2010 Audi RS6
To start off, 2010 Audi RS6 is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,980 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Audi RS6 (572 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 382 more horse power than 1958 Cadillac 62. (190 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Audi RS6 should accelerate faster than 1958 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 57 kg more than 2010 Audi RS6.
Because 2010 Audi RS6 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1958 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Audi RS6 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Cadillac 62 | 2010 Audi RS6 | |
Make | Cadillac | Audi |
Model | 62 | RS6 |
Year Released | 1958 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5980 cc | 4991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 10 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 572 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 2085 kg | 2028 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5520 mm | 4930 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1470 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2850 mm |