1958 Cadillac 62 vs. 2010 Ford Flex
To start off, 2010 Ford Flex is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,979 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford Flex (262 HP @ 6250 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 1958 Cadillac 62. (189 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford Flex should accelerate faster than 1958 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 167 kg more than 2010 Ford Flex.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Cadillac 62 | 2010 Ford Flex | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | 62 | Flex |
| Year Released | 1958 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5979 cc | 3500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 189 HP | 262 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 2195 kg | 2028 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5640 mm | 5126 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2995 mm |
