1958 Cadillac 62 vs. 2010 Ford Ranger
To start off, 2010 Ford Ranger is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,980 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Ford Ranger (207 HP @ 5250 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 1958 Cadillac 62. (189 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Ford Ranger should accelerate faster than 1958 Cadillac 62.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Cadillac 62 | 2010 Ford Ranger | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | 62 | Ranger |
| Year Released | 1958 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5980 cc | 4000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 189 HP | 207 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Length | 5640 mm | 5171 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 3193 mm |
