1958 Cadillac 62 vs. 2010 Honda Accord
To start off, 2010 Honda Accord is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,980 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, both vehicles can yield 190 horse power. So under normal driving conditions, the acceleration of both vehicles should be relatively similar. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 608 kg more than 2010 Honda Accord.
Because 1958 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Honda Accord, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Cadillac 62 | 2010 Honda Accord | |
Make | Cadillac | Honda |
Model | 62 | Accord |
Year Released | 1958 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5980 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 190 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 7000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 2085 kg | 1477 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5520 mm | 4849 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1849 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1433 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2741 mm |