1958 Cadillac 62 vs. 2010 Honda Fit
To start off, 2010 Honda Fit is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,980 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Cadillac 62 (189 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 72 more horse power than 2010 Honda Fit. (117 HP @ 6600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1958 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2010 Honda Fit. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 963 kg more than 2010 Honda Fit. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Cadillac 62 | 2010 Honda Fit | |
| Make | Cadillac | Honda |
| Model | 62 | Fit |
| Year Released | 1958 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5980 cc | 1500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 189 HP | 117 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6600 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 2095 kg | 1132 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5640 mm | 4105 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2499 mm |
