1958 Cadillac 62 vs. 2010 Jaguar XF
To start off, 2010 Jaguar XF is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,980 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Cadillac 62 (189 HP) has 2 more horse power than 2010 Jaguar XF. (187 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1958 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2010 Jaguar XF.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Cadillac 62 | 2010 Jaguar XF | |
| Make | Cadillac | Jaguar |
| Model | 62 | XF |
| Year Released | 1958 | 2010 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5980 cc | 2200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 189 HP | 187 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Vehicle Length | 5640 mm | 4961 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2908 mm |
