1958 Cadillac 62 vs. 2010 Jeep Commander
To start off, 2010 Jeep Commander is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,980 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Jeep Commander (305 HP @ 5650 RPM) has 115 more horse power than 1958 Cadillac 62. (190 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Jeep Commander should accelerate faster than 1958 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 687 kg more than 2010 Jeep Commander.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Cadillac 62 | 2010 Jeep Commander | |
Make | Cadillac | Jeep |
Model | 62 | Commander |
Year Released | 1958 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5980 cc | 4701 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 305 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5650 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 2085 kg | 1398 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5520 mm | 4790 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1840 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2790 mm |