1958 Cadillac 62 vs. 2010 Volvo S40
To start off, 2010 Volvo S40 is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,979 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Cadillac 62 (189 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 21 more horse power than 2010 Volvo S40. (168 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1958 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2010 Volvo S40. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 726 kg more than 2010 Volvo S40. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Cadillac 62 | 2010 Volvo S40 | |
Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
Model | 62 | S40 |
Year Released | 1958 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5979 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 189 HP | 168 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 2195 kg | 1469 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5640 mm | 4475 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2639 mm |