1958 Cadillac 62 vs. 2010 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2010 Volvo XC90 is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,980 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Volvo XC90 (200 HP) has 10 more horse power than 1958 Cadillac 62. (190 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Volvo XC90 should accelerate faster than 1958 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2010 Volvo XC90 weights approximately 70 kg more than 1958 Cadillac 62. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2010 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1958 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Cadillac 62 | 2010 Volvo XC90 | |
Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
Model | 62 | XC90 |
Year Released | 1958 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5980 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 200 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 2085 kg | 2155 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5520 mm | 4808 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1897 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1783 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2860 mm |