1958 Cadillac 62 vs. 2011 Chevrolet Orlando
To start off, 2011 Chevrolet Orlando is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,980 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Cadillac 62 (189 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 2011 Chevrolet Orlando. (139 HP @ 6200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1958 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2011 Chevrolet Orlando. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 567 kg more than 2011 Chevrolet Orlando. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Cadillac 62 | 2011 Chevrolet Orlando | |
Make | Cadillac | Chevrolet |
Model | 62 | Orlando |
Year Released | 1958 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5980 cc | 1796 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 189 HP | 139 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 2095 kg | 1528 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5640 mm | 4652 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2760 mm |