1958 Cadillac 62 vs. 2011 Ford Bantam
To start off, 2011 Ford Bantam is newer by 53 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,980 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Cadillac 62 (190 HP) has 116 more horse power than 2011 Ford Bantam. (74 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1958 Cadillac 62 should accelerate faster than 2011 Ford Bantam. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 1119 kg more than 2011 Ford Bantam. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1958 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2011 Ford Bantam, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Cadillac 62 | 2011 Ford Bantam | |
Make | Cadillac | Ford |
Model | 62 | Bantam |
Year Released | 1958 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5980 cc | 1296 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 74 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 2085 kg | 966 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5520 mm | 4280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1470 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1640 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2670 mm |