1958 Cadillac 62 vs. 2012 Land Rover Range Rover
To start off, 2012 Land Rover Range Rover is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,979 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Land Rover Range Rover (510 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 321 more horse power than 1958 Cadillac 62. (189 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Land Rover Range Rover should accelerate faster than 1958 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Land Rover Range Rover weights approximately 477 kg more than 1958 Cadillac 62. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Cadillac 62 | 2012 Land Rover Range Rover | |
| Make | Cadillac | Land Rover |
| Model | 62 | Range Rover |
| Year Released | 1958 | 2012 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5979 cc | 5000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 189 HP | 510 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 2195 kg | 2672 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5640 mm | 4973 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2891 mm |
