1958 Cadillac 62 vs. 2012 Nissan Titan
To start off, 2012 Nissan Titan is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,980 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Nissan Titan (317 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 127 more horse power than 1958 Cadillac 62. (190 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Nissan Titan should accelerate faster than 1958 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Nissan Titan weights approximately 218 kg more than 1958 Cadillac 62. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2012 Nissan Titan is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1958 Cadillac 62. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Nissan Titan will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Cadillac 62 | 2012 Nissan Titan | |
Make | Cadillac | Nissan |
Model | 62 | Titan |
Year Released | 1958 | 2012 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5980 cc | 5551 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 317 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 2085 kg | 2303 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5520 mm | 5710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 2030 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1940 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 4060 mm |