1958 Cadillac 62 vs. 2013 Jaguar XK
To start off, 2013 Jaguar XK is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,980 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Jaguar XK (542 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 353 more horse power than 1958 Cadillac 62. (189 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Jaguar XK should accelerate faster than 1958 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 245 kg more than 2013 Jaguar XK.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Cadillac 62 | 2013 Jaguar XK | |
| Make | Cadillac | Jaguar |
| Model | 62 | XK |
| Year Released | 1958 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 5980 cc | 5000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 189 HP | 542 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 2095 kg | 1850 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5640 mm | 4794 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2752 mm |
