1958 Cadillac 62 vs. 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Sport
To start off, 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Sport is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,979 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Sport (370 HP @ 6500 RPM) has 181 more horse power than 1958 Cadillac 62. (189 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Sport should accelerate faster than 1958 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Sport weights approximately 294 kg more than 1958 Cadillac 62. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Cadillac 62 | 2013 Land Rover Range Rover Sport | |
Make | Cadillac | Land Rover |
Model | 62 | Range Rover Sport |
Year Released | 1958 | 2013 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5979 cc | 2013 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | electric |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 189 HP | 370 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel / Electric Hybrid |
Vehicle Weight | 2195 kg | 2489 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5640 mm | 4783 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2745 mm |