1958 Cadillac 62 vs. 2013 Mercedes-Benz E
To start off, 2013 Mercedes-Benz E is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,980 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Mercedes-Benz E (237 HP) has 47 more horse power than 1958 Cadillac 62. (190 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Mercedes-Benz E should accelerate faster than 1958 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 613 kg more than 2013 Mercedes-Benz E.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Cadillac 62 | 2013 Mercedes-Benz E | |
| Make | Cadillac | Mercedes-Benz |
| Model | 62 | E |
| Year Released | 1958 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5980 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | W |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 190 HP | 237 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 2085 kg | 1472 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5520 mm | 4868 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 2071 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1465 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2874 mm |
