1958 Cadillac 62 vs. 2013 Volvo X670
To start off, 2013 Volvo X670 is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,980 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Volvo X670 (237 HP @ 6400 RPM) has 47 more horse power than 1958 Cadillac 62. (190 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Volvo X670 should accelerate faster than 1958 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 213 kg more than 2013 Volvo X670.
Because 1958 Cadillac 62 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Cadillac 62. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2013 Volvo X670, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Cadillac 62 | 2013 Volvo X670 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
| Model | 62 | X670 |
| Year Released | 1958 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5980 cc | 3200 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 6 valves |
| Horse Power | 190 HP | 237 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 2085 kg | 1872 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5520 mm | 4838 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2040 mm | 1870 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1590 mm | 1604 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2815 mm |
