1958 Cadillac 62 vs. 2013 Volvo XC60
To start off, 2013 Volvo XC60 is newer by 55 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Cadillac 62. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Cadillac 62 would be higher. At 5,979 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac 62 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Volvo XC60 (321 HP @ 5400 RPM) has 132 more horse power than 1958 Cadillac 62. (189 HP @ 4800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Volvo XC60 should accelerate faster than 1958 Cadillac 62. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Cadillac 62 weights approximately 277 kg more than 2013 Volvo XC60.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Cadillac 62 | 2013 Volvo XC60 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
| Model | 62 | XC60 |
| Year Released | 1958 | 2013 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5979 cc | 3000 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 6 valves |
| Horse Power | 189 HP | 321 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 2195 kg | 1918 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5640 mm | 4627 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2774 mm |
