1958 Cadillac Biarritz vs. 1962 Volvo 120
To start off, 1962 Volvo 120 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Cadillac Biarritz. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Cadillac Biarritz would be higher. At 5,980 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac Biarritz is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Cadillac Biarritz (190 HP) has 123 more horse power than 1962 Volvo 120. (67 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1958 Cadillac Biarritz should accelerate faster than 1962 Volvo 120. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Cadillac Biarritz weights approximately 1290 kg more than 1962 Volvo 120. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Cadillac Biarritz | 1962 Volvo 120 | |
| Make | Cadillac | Volvo |
| Model | Biarritz | 120 |
| Year Released | 1958 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5980 cc | 1778 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 190 HP | 67 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Vehicle Weight | 2300 kg | 1010 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2610 mm |
