1958 Cadillac Biarritz vs. 1996 Ford Contour
To start off, 1996 Ford Contour is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Cadillac Biarritz. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Cadillac Biarritz would be higher. At 5,980 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac Biarritz is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Cadillac Biarritz (190 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 61 more horse power than 1996 Ford Contour. (129 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1958 Cadillac Biarritz should accelerate faster than 1996 Ford Contour. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Cadillac Biarritz weights approximately 1058 kg more than 1996 Ford Contour. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1958 Cadillac Biarritz is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Cadillac Biarritz. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Ford Contour, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1958 Cadillac Biarritz | 1996 Ford Contour | |
| Make | Cadillac | Ford |
| Model | Biarritz | Contour |
| Year Released | 1958 | 1996 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5980 cc | 1989 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 190 HP | 129 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Vehicle Weight | 2300 kg | 1242 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4680 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2710 mm |
