1958 Cadillac Biarritz vs. 1996 Lada Samara
To start off, 1996 Lada Samara is newer by 38 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1958 Cadillac Biarritz. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1958 Cadillac Biarritz would be higher. At 5,980 cc (8 cylinders), 1958 Cadillac Biarritz is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1958 Cadillac Biarritz (190 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 126 more horse power than 1996 Lada Samara. (64 HP @ 5550 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1958 Cadillac Biarritz should accelerate faster than 1996 Lada Samara. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1958 Cadillac Biarritz weights approximately 1380 kg more than 1996 Lada Samara. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1958 Cadillac Biarritz is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1958 Cadillac Biarritz. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Lada Samara, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1958 Cadillac Biarritz | 1996 Lada Samara | |
Make | Cadillac | Lada |
Model | Biarritz | Samara |
Year Released | 1958 | 1996 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5980 cc | 1288 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 64 HP |
Engine RPM | 4800 RPM | 5550 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Weight | 2300 kg | 920 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5680 mm | 4220 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3300 mm | 2470 mm |